From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Fri, 22 Sep 2006 17:34:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.168.28]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id k8N0YVaG015840 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 17:34:32 -0700 Received: from smtp.osdl.org (smtp.osdl.org [65.172.181.4]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id A2B4D45BB82 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:34:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2006 16:34:15 -0700 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] rescue large xfs preferred iosize from the inode diet patch Message-Id: <20060922163415.4e137374.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <45146F76.3010301@sandeen.net> References: <45131334.6050803@sandeen.net> <45134472.7080002@sgi.com> <20060922161040.609286fa.akpm@osdl.org> <45146F76.3010301@sandeen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Timothy Shimmin , Linux Kernel Mailing List , xfs mailing list On Fri, 22 Sep 2006 18:19:18 -0500 Eric Sandeen wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > >> So the fix for this is coming soon (and the fix is different from the > >> one above). > >> > > > > eh? Eric's patch is based on -mm, which includes the XFS git tree. If I > > go and merge the inode-diet patches from -mm, XFS gets broken until you > > guys merge the above mystery patch. (I prefer to merge the -mm patches > > after all the git trees have gone, but sometimes maintainers dawdle and I > > get bored of waiting). > > > > Is git://oss.sgi.com:8090/nathans/xfs-2.6 obsolete, or are you hiding stuff > > from me? ;) > > > > > well it's in cvs: That's nearly four months old! > http://oss.sgi.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/xfs-linux/linux-2.6/xfs_iops.c.diff?r1=text&tr1=1.254&r2=text&tr2=1.253&f=h