From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 05 Oct 2006 14:58:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.168.29]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id k95LvsaG017912 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 14:57:55 -0700 Received: from zenon.apartia.fr (zenon.apartia.fr [82.66.93.83]) by cuda.sgi.com (Spam Firewall) with ESMTP id C77BFD17E096 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 13:42:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from styx.apartia.fr (styx.apartia.fr [10.0.3.109]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "styx.apartia.fr", Issuer "ca.apartia.fr" (verified OK)) by zenon.apartia.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9767F8C80631 for ; Thu, 5 Oct 2006 22:42:40 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 22:42:40 +0200 From: Louis-David Mitterrand Subject: is quotacheck fast with xfs? Message-ID: <20061005204240.GA7922@apartia.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: xfs@oss.sgi.com Hello, We have a 500GB mail server with 200 users presently with reiserfs. At boot time quotacheck takes close to one hour. Would quotacheck be faster on xfs? Thanks,