From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:13:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id k9N2DIaG016895 for ; Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:13:20 -0700 Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2006 12:12:03 +1000 From: David Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH] diskquota: 32bit quota tools on 64bit architectures Message-ID: <20061023021203.GH8394166@melbourne.sgi.com> References: <200610191232.k9JCW7CF015486@vass.7ka.mipt.ru> <20061019172948.GA30975@infradead.org> <200610200610.k9K6AXgP031789@vass.7ka.mipt.ru> <200610211828.33230.arnd@arndb.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200610211828.33230.arnd@arndb.de> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Vasily Tarasov , Christoph Hellwig , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Andrew Morton , Jan Kara , Dmitry Mishin , Vasily Averin , Kirill Korotaev , OpenVZ Developers List , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Sat, Oct 21, 2006 at 06:28:32PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On a related topic, I just noticed > > typedef struct fs_qfilestat { > __u64 qfs_ino; /* inode number */ > __u64 qfs_nblks; /* number of BBs 512-byte-blks */ > __u32 qfs_nextents; /* number of extents */ > } fs_qfilestat_t; > > typedef struct fs_quota_stat { > __s8 qs_version; /* version number for future changes */ > __u16 qs_flags; /* XFS_QUOTA_{U,P,G}DQ_{ACCT,ENFD} */ > __s8 qs_pad; /* unused */ > fs_qfilestat_t qs_uquota; /* user quota storage information */ > fs_qfilestat_t qs_gquota; /* group quota storage information */ > __u32 qs_incoredqs; /* number of dquots incore */ > __s32 qs_btimelimit; /* limit for blks timer */ > __s32 qs_itimelimit; /* limit for inodes timer */ > __s32 qs_rtbtimelimit;/* limit for rt blks timer */ > __u16 qs_bwarnlimit; /* limit for num warnings */ > __u16 qs_iwarnlimit; /* limit for num warnings */ > } fs_quota_stat_t; Ah, the XFS quota structures..... > This one seems to have a more severe problem in x86_64 compat > mode. I haven't tried it, but isn't everything down from > gs_gquota aligned differently on i386? Yes - this is just one of several interfaces into XFS that need compat handling that don't have them right now. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group