From: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
To: Timothy Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] (and bad attr2 bug) - pack xfs_sb_t for 64-bit arches
Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2006 13:39:46 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061117023946.GN11034@melbourne.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BB70F203E29C2D37A2F727C8@timothy-shimmins-power-mac-g5.local>
On Fri, Nov 17, 2006 at 11:08:40AM +1000, Timothy Shimmin wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
>
> Well there is a bug in the sb endian translation code then or its setup.
> All the field accesses should be correct, no?
The problem is the size of the variable translated in xfs_xlatesb()
is the offset of the next field minus the offset of the current
field.
With the last filed of the structure, it ends up being the
size of the structure minus the offset of the field. On a 32 bit
machine, the structure is 4 bytes larger that the offset of
the feature2 field. On 64 bit machine, the strucutre is
8 bytes larger than the offset of the features2 field,
so it translates is as though it was a 64 bit field,
not a 32 bit field.....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-17 2:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-16 19:00 [PATCH] (and bad attr2 bug) - pack xfs_sb_t for 64-bit arches Eric Sandeen
2006-11-16 22:10 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-11-20 3:50 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-11-21 4:02 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-11-22 1:02 ` Russell Cattelan
2006-11-22 8:59 ` Timothy Shimmin
2006-11-22 15:44 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-11-22 16:24 ` Russell Cattelan
2006-11-22 16:38 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-11-23 7:09 ` Timothy Shimmin
2006-11-23 17:37 ` Russell Cattelan
2006-11-24 4:47 ` Timothy Shimmin
2006-11-27 12:50 ` Tim Shimmin
2006-11-29 9:56 ` [PATCH] attr2 patch for data btrees & attr 2 was: " Timothy Shimmin
2006-11-23 22:49 ` [PATCH] " David Chinner
2006-11-16 22:45 ` David Chinner
2006-11-16 22:55 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-11-17 15:53 ` Russell Cattelan
2006-11-17 1:08 ` Timothy Shimmin
2006-11-17 2:39 ` David Chinner [this message]
2006-11-17 4:11 ` Timothy Shimmin
2006-11-17 5:55 ` David Chinner
2006-11-17 6:34 ` sandeen
2006-11-17 6:52 ` Nathan Scott
2006-11-17 15:20 ` sandeen
2006-11-19 23:11 ` Nathan Scott
2006-11-20 1:39 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-11-20 3:00 ` Nathan Scott
2006-11-20 3:32 ` Eric Sandeen
2006-11-20 3:37 ` Nathan Scott
2006-11-17 6:58 ` David Chinner
2006-11-17 23:49 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-05-17 14:41 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-05-21 7:42 ` David Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061117023946.GN11034@melbourne.sgi.com \
--to=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=tes@sgi.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox