From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:42:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id kAUNgmaG031346 for ; Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:42:50 -0800 Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 10:41:46 +1100 From: David Chinner Subject: Re: TAKE 957159 - Reduce XFS 4k stack kernel issues Message-ID: <20061130234146.GR37654165@melbourne.sgi.com> References: <20061130080359.E3F7C58FF58B@chook.melbourne.sgi.com> <456F4A25.80709@sandeen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <456F4A25.80709@sandeen.net> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Eric Sandeen Cc: David Chinner , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 03:16:21PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > David, did this add any new static declarations, or just get the > existing ones into shape? It just got the existing stuff into shape and fixed the xfs_clear_inode inlining problems. > IOW, I think I should rework my make-more-things-static patch? Sure - it would be good to get it in before the .20-rc1 merge window closes.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group