From: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
To: "Haar János" <djani22@netcenter.hu>
Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: xfslogd-spinlock bug?
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 09:44:57 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061217224457.GN33919298@melbourne.sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000d01c72127$3d7509b0$0400a8c0@dcccs>
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 12:19:45PM +0100, Haar János wrote:
> Hi
>
> I have some news.
>
> I dont know there is a context between 2 messages, but i can see, the
> spinlock bug comes always on cpu #3.
>
> Somebody have any idea?
Your disk interrupts are directed to CPU 3, and so log I/O completion
occurs on that CPU.
> Dec 16 12:08:36 dy-base BUG: spinlock bad magic on CPU#3, xfslogd/3/317
> Dec 16 12:08:36 dy-base general protection fault: 0000 [1]
> Dec 16 12:08:36 dy-base SMP
> Dec 16 12:08:36 dy-base
> Dec 16 12:08:36 dy-base CPU 3
> Dec 16 12:08:36 dy-base
> Dec 16 12:08:36 dy-base Modules linked in:
> Dec 16 12:08:36 dy-base nbd
Are you using XFS on a NBD?
> Dec 16 12:08:36 dy-base rd
> Dec 16 12:08:36 dy-base netconsole
> Dec 16 12:08:36 dy-base e1000
> Dec 16 12:08:36 dy-base video
> Dec 16 12:08:36 dy-base
> Dec 16 12:08:36 dy-base Pid: 317, comm: xfslogd/3 Not tainted 2.6.19 #1
> Dec 16 12:08:36 dy-base RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff803f3aba>]
> Dec 16 12:08:36 dy-base [<ffffffff803f3aba>] spin_bug+0x69/0xdf
> Dec 16 12:08:36 dy-base RSP: 0018:ffff81011fdedbc0 EFLAGS: 00010002
> Dec 16 12:08:36 dy-base RAX: 0000000000000033 RBX: 6b6b6b6b6b6b6b6b RCX:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Anyone recognise that pattern?
> Dec 16 12:08:36 dy-base Call Trace:
> Dec 16 12:08:36 dy-base [<ffffffff803f3bdc>] _raw_spin_lock+0x23/0xf1
> Dec 16 12:08:36 dy-base [<ffffffff805e7f2b>] _spin_lock_irqsave+0x11/0x18
> Dec 16 12:08:36 dy-base [<ffffffff80222aab>] __wake_up+0x22/0x50
> Dec 16 12:08:36 dy-base [<ffffffff803c97f9>] xfs_buf_unpin+0x21/0x23
> Dec 16 12:08:36 dy-base [<ffffffff803970a4>] xfs_buf_item_unpin+0x2e/0xa6
This implies a spinlock inside a wait_queue_head_t is corrupt.
What are you type of system do you have, and what sort of
workload are you running?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-12-22 9:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-12-11 23:00 xfslogd-spinlock bug? Haar János
2006-12-12 14:32 ` Justin Piszcz
[not found] ` <00ab01c71e53$942af2f0$0400a8c0@dcccs>
2006-12-16 11:19 ` Haar János
2006-12-17 22:44 ` David Chinner [this message]
2006-12-17 23:56 ` Haar János
2006-12-18 6:24 ` David Chinner
2006-12-18 8:17 ` Haar János
2006-12-18 22:36 ` David Chinner
2006-12-18 23:39 ` Haar János
2006-12-19 2:52 ` David Chinner
2006-12-19 4:47 ` David Chinner
2006-12-27 12:58 ` Haar János
2007-01-07 23:14 ` David Chinner
2007-01-10 17:18 ` Janos Haar
2007-01-11 3:34 ` David Chinner
2007-01-11 20:15 ` Janos Haar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20061217224457.GN33919298@melbourne.sgi.com \
--to=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=djani22@netcenter.hu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox