From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:48:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id l08NmZqw026489 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2007 15:48:37 -0800 Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:47:28 +1100 From: David Chinner Subject: bd_mount_mutex -> bd_mount_sem (was Re: xfs_file_ioctl / xfs_freeze: BUG: warning at kernel/mutex-debug.c:80/debug_mutex_unlock()) Message-ID: <20070108234728.GC33919298@melbourne.sgi.com> References: <20070104001420.GA32440@m.safari.iki.fi> <20070107213734.GS44411608@melbourne.sgi.com> <20070108110323.GA3803@m.safari.iki.fi> <45A27416.8030600@sandeen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45A27416.8030600@sandeen.net> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Eric Sandeen Cc: linux-kernel Mailing List , xfs@oss.sgi.com, akpm@osdl.org On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 10:40:54AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Sami Farin wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 08:37:34 +1100, David Chinner wrote: > > ... > >>> fstab was there just fine after -u. > >> Oh, that still hasn't been fixed? > > > > Looked like it =) > > Hm, it was proposed upstream a while ago: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/9/27/137 > > I guess it got lost? Seems like it. Andrew, did this ever get queued for merge? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group