public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>, David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>,
	linux-kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: bd_mount_mutex -> bd_mount_sem (was Re: xfs_file_ioctl / xfs_freeze: BUG: warning at kernel/mutex-debug.c:80/debug_mutex_unlock())
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 10:04:20 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070109100420.GB14713@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070108195127.67fe86b8.akpm@osdl.org>

On Mon, Jan 08, 2007 at 07:51:27PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I don't even know what code we're talking about here...
> 
> I'm under the impression that XFS will return to userspace with a
> filesystem lock held, under the expectation (ie: requirement) that
> userspace will later come in and release that lock.
> 
> If that's not true, then what _is_ happening in there?
> 
> If that _is_ true then, well, that sucks a bit.

It's not a filesystem lock.  It's a per-blockdevice lock that prevents
multiple people from freezing the filesystem at the same time, aswell
as providing exclusion between a frozen filesystem an mount-related
activity.  It's a traditional text-box example for a semaphore.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-01-09 10:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20070104001420.GA32440@m.safari.iki.fi>
2007-01-07 21:37 ` xfs_file_ioctl / xfs_freeze: BUG: warning at kernel/mutex-debug.c:80/debug_mutex_unlock() David Chinner
2007-01-08 11:03   ` Sami Farin
2007-01-08 16:40     ` Eric Sandeen
2007-01-08 23:47       ` bd_mount_mutex -> bd_mount_sem (was Re: xfs_file_ioctl / xfs_freeze: BUG: warning at kernel/mutex-debug.c:80/debug_mutex_unlock()) David Chinner
2007-01-09  0:19         ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-09  3:12           ` Eric Sandeen
2007-01-09  3:18             ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-09  3:38               ` Eric Sandeen
2007-01-09  3:51                 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-09  4:17                   ` Nathan Scott
2007-01-09  4:49                     ` David Chinner
2007-01-09  6:02                       ` [**BULK SPAM**] " Nathan Scott
2007-01-09 10:04                   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2007-01-10  1:34                     ` David Chinner
2007-01-09 10:02           ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-01-08 23:56   ` xfs_file_ioctl / xfs_freeze: BUG: warning at kernel/mutex-debug.c:80/debug_mutex_unlock() Andrew Morton
2007-01-09  6:41     ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070109100420.GB14713@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=dgc@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox