* Review: Don't use kmap() in xfs_iozero().
@ 2007-02-02 5:40 David Chinner
2007-02-02 11:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Chinner @ 2007-02-02 5:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs-dev; +Cc: xfs
kmap is inefficient and does scale well. kmap_atomic() is a better
choice. Use the generic wrapper function instead of open coding the
kmap-memset-dcache flush-kumap stuff. Suggested by Andrew Morton.
Comments?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
---
fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_lrw.c | 10 +++-------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Index: 2.6.x-xfs-new/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_lrw.c
===================================================================
--- 2.6.x-xfs-new.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_lrw.c 2007-01-31 13:56:12.000000000 +1100
+++ 2.6.x-xfs-new/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_lrw.c 2007-01-31 14:19:50.379179841 +1100
@@ -138,7 +138,6 @@ xfs_iozero(
unsigned bytes;
struct page *page;
struct address_space *mapping;
- char *kaddr;
int status;
mapping = ip->i_mapping;
@@ -156,15 +155,13 @@ xfs_iozero(
if (!page)
break;
- kaddr = kmap(page);
status = mapping->a_ops->prepare_write(NULL, page, offset,
offset + bytes);
- if (status) {
+ if (status)
goto unlock;
- }
- memset((void *) (kaddr + offset), 0, bytes);
- flush_dcache_page(page);
+ memclear_highpage_flush(page, (unsigned int)offset, bytes);
+
status = mapping->a_ops->commit_write(NULL, page, offset,
offset + bytes);
if (!status) {
@@ -175,7 +172,6 @@ xfs_iozero(
}
unlock:
- kunmap(page);
unlock_page(page);
page_cache_release(page);
if (status)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Review: Don't use kmap() in xfs_iozero().
2007-02-02 5:40 Review: Don't use kmap() in xfs_iozero() David Chinner
@ 2007-02-02 11:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-02-02 13:39 ` David Chinner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2007-02-02 11:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Chinner; +Cc: xfs-dev, xfs
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 04:40:44PM +1100, David Chinner wrote:
> kmap is inefficient and does scale well. kmap_atomic() is a better
> choice. Use the generic wrapper function instead of open coding the
> kmap-memset-dcache flush-kumap stuff. Suggested by Andrew Morton.
>
> Comments?
Looks good.
> + memclear_highpage_flush(page, (unsigned int)offset, bytes);
Do you need the cast here? An unsigned long should be automatically
demoted to an unsigned int when passing it as an argument.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Review: Don't use kmap() in xfs_iozero().
2007-02-02 11:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2007-02-02 13:39 ` David Chinner
2007-02-02 18:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Chinner @ 2007-02-02 13:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: David Chinner, xfs-dev, xfs
On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 11:48:30AM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 04:40:44PM +1100, David Chinner wrote:
> > kmap is inefficient and does scale well. kmap_atomic() is a better
> > choice. Use the generic wrapper function instead of open coding the
> > kmap-memset-dcache flush-kumap stuff. Suggested by Andrew Morton.
> >
> > Comments?
>
> Looks good.
>
> > + memclear_highpage_flush(page, (unsigned int)offset, bytes);
>
> Do you need the cast here? An unsigned long should be automatically
> demoted to an unsigned int when passing it as an argument.
Even on 64 bit platforms? I just added an explicit cast as a matter
of avoiding potential gcc warnings on other platforms/compiler
versions. Maybe I'm just being paranoid and I can remove it?
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Review: Don't use kmap() in xfs_iozero().
2007-02-02 13:39 ` David Chinner
@ 2007-02-02 18:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2007-02-02 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Chinner; +Cc: Christoph Hellwig, xfs-dev, xfs
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 12:39:41AM +1100, David Chinner wrote:
> Even on 64 bit platforms? I just added an explicit cast as a matter
> of avoiding potential gcc warnings on other platforms/compiler
> versions. Maybe I'm just being paranoid and I can remove it?
Yes, it's fine on 64bit platforms aswell - I just built my equivalent
buffer.c changes on 64bit powerpc and we have lots of similar cases
all over the tree.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-02-02 18:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-02-02 5:40 Review: Don't use kmap() in xfs_iozero() David Chinner
2007-02-02 11:48 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-02-02 13:39 ` David Chinner
2007-02-02 18:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox