From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Sun, 04 Feb 2007 11:42:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from postfix1-g20.free.fr (postfix1-g20.free.fr [212.27.60.42]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l14JgW3c020847 for ; Sun, 4 Feb 2007 11:42:33 -0800 Received: from smtp2-g19.free.fr (smtp2-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.28]) by postfix1-g20.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08B288FE0E5 for ; Sun, 4 Feb 2007 20:18:11 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2007 20:18:08 +0100 From: Emmanuel Florac Subject: Re: Spam on list? Message-ID: <20070204201808.05240120@galadriel.home> In-Reply-To: <45C62982.1090206@sandeen.net> References: <45C62982.1090206@sandeen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Justin Piszcz , xfs@oss.sgi.com Le Sun, 04 Feb 2007 12:44:18 -0600 vous écriviez: > The one spam measure that's not in place is subscriber-only posting. > > I think it may be time to revisit that decision. It's gotten really > bad lately. All other lists I'm following do so, and nobody complains. -- -------------------------------------------------- Emmanuel Florac www.intellique.com --------------------------------------------------