From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Sat, 17 Mar 2007 07:32:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mtagate1.uk.ibm.com (mtagate1.uk.ibm.com [195.212.29.134]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l2HEWe6p025842 for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2007 07:32:42 -0700 Received: from d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.38.185]) by mtagate1.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l2HEWcAX084742 for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2007 14:32:38 GMT Received: from d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.37.213]) by d06nrmr1407.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v8.3) with ESMTP id l2HEWcUc1626332 for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2007 14:32:38 GMT Received: from d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d06av03.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.13.3) with ESMTP id l2HEWb7Z005719 for ; Sat, 17 Mar 2007 14:32:38 GMT Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2007 15:30:43 +0100 From: Heiko Carstens Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] sys_fallocate() system call Message-ID: <20070317143043.GA8577@osiris.ibm.com> References: <20070117094658.GA17390@amitarora.in.ibm.com> <20070225022326.137b4875.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070301183445.GA7911@amitarora.in.ibm.com> <20070316143101.GA10152@amitarora.in.ibm.com> <20070316161704.GE8525@osiris.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <17915.48105.70494.958220@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20070317110706.GB29931@parisc-linux.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070317110706.GB29931@parisc-linux.org> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Paul Mackerras , "Amit K. Arora" , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, Andrew Morton , suparna@in.ibm.com, cmm@us.ibm.com, alex@clusterfs.com, suzuki@in.ibm.com On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 05:07:06AM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 08:59:05PM +1100, Paul Mackerras wrote: > > ... but wouldn't work on 32-bit powerpc. :( We would end up with a > > pad argument between fd and offset, giving 7 arguments in all > > (counting the loff_t's as 2), but we only support 6. > > Ditto mips and parisc. Can't be. Or: mips supports 7 arguments and parisc doesn't pad. Otherwise they couldn't have wired up sys_sync_file_range(int fd, loff_t offset, loff_t nbytes, unsigned int flags) But from what I read, it's currently not possible for 32-bit powerpc to wire up the already present sync_file_range system call.