From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Fri, 23 Mar 2007 01:37:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.interline.it (mail.interline.it [195.182.241.4]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l2N8bS6p018402 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 01:37:31 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.interline.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id D864D103B for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 09:28:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.interline.it ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pin [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 27574-05 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 09:28:17 +0100 (CET) From: "Daniele P." Subject: Re: xfsrepair memory consumption Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 09:36:47 +0100 References: <200703210843.TAA08491@larry.melbourne.sgi.com> <200703211208.27665.daniele@interline.it> <20070321213611.GB1208@tuatara.stupidest.org> In-Reply-To: <20070321213611.GB1208@tuatara.stupidest.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200703230936.47788.daniele@interline.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wednesday 21 March 2007 22:36, Chris Wedgwood wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 12:08:27PM +0100, Daniele P. wrote: > > Phase 6 still uses little more memory (killed!). > > I will add more memory and will test later. > > Stupid question (Sorry, I didn't read the thread that carefully), is > there any reason you can't just add swap-space and let it thrash a > little? Oh, it's less expensive (less typing) to add ram because it's a virtual machine. Finally using the 2.8.20-1 version requires 1 GB of memory vs 750 MB for 2.6.20-1. Next time I will add more swap by default. Regards, Daniele P.