public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Kaehn <tk@westend.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Strange delete performance using XFS
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 15:05:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070404130535.GE18320@mail3b.westend.com> (raw)

Hi,

I've got a strange problem on one machine using XFS. Deleting large
directories (containing about 100000 files, 20k each) using "rm -rf"
lasts nearly as long as creating the the files using a bash loop.

The machine is running Debian Sarge with a vanilla 2.6.20.3 kernel.
CPU: Dual Xeon(TM) CPU 3.20GHz
RAM: 4 GB
RAID10: 4x 320 GB disks connected to 3ware 9550SXU-8LP 
 (Firmware Version = FE9X 3.08.00.004)

The XFS was first created using default options and later on with
"-d su=64k,sw=2 -l su=64k" which improved overall performance
but not delete performance.

Has anyone realized similar effects? On a different server (Dell 6850)
the directory can be deleted within seconds. What could be the reason
for the huge difference in delete performance?

Please see below for "time" output. 

| # time for i in `seq 1 100000`; do dd if=/dev/zero of=$i bs=1k count=20 >/dev/null 2>&1; done
| 
| real    6m6.814s
| user    0m30.290s
| sys     2m42.562s
| # time rm -rf y
| 
| real    5m18.034s
| user    0m0.036s
| sys     0m8.169s

In contrast to this the result on the Dell machine looks more
reasonable:

| # time for i in `seq 1 100000`; do dd if=/dev/zero of=$i bs=1k count=20 >/dev/null 2>&1; done
| 
| real    9m26.658s
| user    0m24.134s
| sys     3m3.623s
| # time rm -rf x
| 
| real    0m10.254s
| user    0m0.124s
| sys     0m10.105s

Ciao,
Thomas

PS: Using JFS and ext3 it is also possible to delete the above directory
in a couple of seconds. Only XFS seems problematic in this regard on
this system.
-- 
Thomas Kähn                   WESTEND GmbH  |  Internet-Business-Provider
Technik                       CISCO Systems Partner - Authorized Reseller
                              Im Süsterfeld 6          Tel 0241/701333-18
tk@westend.com                D-52072 Aachen              Fax 0241/911879
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Die Gesellschaft ist eingetragen im Handelsregister Aachen unter HRB 7608
Geschäftsführer:           Thomas Neugebauer, Thomas Heller, Michael Kolb

             reply	other threads:[~2007-04-04 13:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-04 13:05 Thomas Kaehn [this message]
2007-04-04 13:29 ` Strange delete performance using XFS Justin Piszcz
2007-04-04 13:47   ` Thomas Kaehn
2007-04-04 13:51     ` Justin Piszcz
2007-04-04 13:57       ` Justin Piszcz
2007-04-04 13:57     ` Justin Piszcz
2007-04-04 14:12       ` Justin Piszcz
2007-04-04 14:21         ` Thomas Kaehn
2007-04-04 14:24           ` Justin Piszcz
2007-04-04 14:35             ` Thomas Kaehn
2007-04-04 20:45               ` Justin Piszcz
2007-04-04 14:13       ` Justin Piszcz
2007-04-05  8:17         ` Thomas Kaehn
2007-04-04 18:36     ` Justin Piszcz
2007-04-05  7:37       ` Thomas Kaehn
2007-04-04 15:45 ` Chris Wedgwood
2007-04-05  7:28   ` Thomas Kaehn
2007-04-05  9:03     ` Thomas Kaehn
2007-04-05 10:21       ` Justin Piszcz
2007-04-05 10:50         ` Thomas Kaehn
2007-04-05 11:11           ` Justin Piszcz
2007-04-05 15:29     ` Chris Wedgwood
2007-04-06 19:02       ` Peter Grandi
2007-04-11  9:36         ` Thomas Kaehn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070404130535.GE18320@mail3b.westend.com \
    --to=tk@westend.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox