From: Thomas Kaehn <tk@westend.com>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Strange delete performance using XFS
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2007 15:47:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070404134724.GF18320@mail3b.westend.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0704040928110.7309@p34.internal.lan>
Hi Justin,
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 09:29:46AM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> >Please see below for "time" output.
> >
> >| # time for i in `seq 1 100000`; do dd if=/dev/zero of=$i bs=1k count=20
> >>/dev/null 2>&1; done
> >|
> >| real 6m6.814s
> >| user 0m30.290s
> >| sys 2m42.562s
> >| # time rm -rf y
> >|
> >| real 5m18.034s
> >| user 0m0.036s
> >| sys 0m8.169s
> Deletes on XFS is one area that is a little slower than other filesystems.
> You can increase the log size during the creation of the filesystem and
> also increase logbufs to 8 and that might help.
Thanks for your suggestions.
I also tried to increase the log size and logbufs mount option. This
optimizes create and delete times to the above values (with default options
both are around 9-10 minutes).
The strange thing is that on a similar Dell machines using XFS, too,
deletes take only ten seconds which would match user and system time.
More than five minutes for deleting 100000 files where ext3 needs
3 seconds on the same machine is actually more than a little bit slower
- to my mind there must be something wrong. JFS needs around 18 seconds.
However I am not sure if the problem is hardware or software related.
I've also tried to use the newest 3ware firmware - but this did not lead
to an improvement.
Ciao,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kähn WESTEND GmbH | Internet-Business-Provider
Technik CISCO Systems Partner - Authorized Reseller
Im Süsterfeld 6 Tel 0241/701333-18
tk@westend.com D-52072 Aachen Fax 0241/911879
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Die Gesellschaft ist eingetragen im Handelsregister Aachen unter HRB 7608
Geschäftsführer: Thomas Neugebauer, Thomas Heller, Michael Kolb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-04 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-04 13:05 Strange delete performance using XFS Thomas Kaehn
2007-04-04 13:29 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-04-04 13:47 ` Thomas Kaehn [this message]
2007-04-04 13:51 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-04-04 13:57 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-04-04 13:57 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-04-04 14:12 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-04-04 14:21 ` Thomas Kaehn
2007-04-04 14:24 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-04-04 14:35 ` Thomas Kaehn
2007-04-04 20:45 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-04-04 14:13 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-04-05 8:17 ` Thomas Kaehn
2007-04-04 18:36 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-04-05 7:37 ` Thomas Kaehn
2007-04-04 15:45 ` Chris Wedgwood
2007-04-05 7:28 ` Thomas Kaehn
2007-04-05 9:03 ` Thomas Kaehn
2007-04-05 10:21 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-04-05 10:50 ` Thomas Kaehn
2007-04-05 11:11 ` Justin Piszcz
2007-04-05 15:29 ` Chris Wedgwood
2007-04-06 19:02 ` Peter Grandi
2007-04-11 9:36 ` Thomas Kaehn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070404134724.GF18320@mail3b.westend.com \
--to=tk@westend.com \
--cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox