From: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>
To: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@linbit.com>,
Barry Naujok <bnaujok@melbourne.sgi.com>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: xfs_repair leaves empty but undeletable dirs in lost+found
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 22:45:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200704102245.00734.Martin@lichtvoll.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070410092443.GA8496@barkeeper1.linbit>
Am Dienstag 10 April 2007 schrieb Lars Ellenberg:
> > Would it be possible for you apply the patch I posted to xfs@oss
> > in Feb http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2007-02/msg00072.html
> > to the latest xfsprogs source, make and install it and run:
> >
> > # xfs_metadump /dev/md1 - | bzip2 > /tmp/bad_xfs.bz2
> >
> > And make the image available for me to download and analyse?
>
> uhm. probably. I'll talk with the guy who owns the data :)
>
> out of curiosity: what exactly would you do with it?
> I mean, would that be sufficient to restore the "badness",
> with the files all filled with zero,
> and you'd be able to reproduce locally?
Hi Lars!
As far as I understand a meta data dump does not contain the actual data
in the files. That would be sufficient als xfs_repair is for repairing
metadata corruption. For analysing the reason why a file is undeleteable
its actual contents should be quite irrelevant. Only thing that could
possibly matter is the amount and location, not the contents of blocks a
file occupies. But that doesn't seem to matter here either.
It would contain meta data information on the directory and file names as
well as timestamps, owner and rights - if you are concerned about the
privacy of your customer you may want to try to reproduce the problem
with different meta data information.
Regards,
--
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-10 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-04 20:36 xfs_repair leaves empty but undeletable dirs in lost+found Lars Ellenberg
2007-04-05 16:22 ` Lars Ellenberg
2007-04-10 1:55 ` Barry Naujok
2007-04-10 9:24 ` Lars Ellenberg
2007-04-10 20:45 ` Martin Steigerwald [this message]
2007-04-10 21:05 ` Lars Ellenberg
2007-04-11 0:16 ` Barry Naujok
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200704102245.00734.Martin@lichtvoll.de \
--to=martin@lichtvoll.de \
--cc=bnaujok@melbourne.sgi.com \
--cc=lars.ellenberg@linbit.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox