From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 19 Apr 2007 06:50:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.interline.it (mail.interline.it [195.182.241.4])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l3JDoBfB001378
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 06:50:14 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.interline.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FD73F52
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:49:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mail.interline.it ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (pin [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
	id 24272-02 for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>;
	Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:48:53 +0200 (CEST)
From: "Daniele P." <daniele@interline.it>
Subject: Re: Inode usage
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:50:03 +0200
References: <4627283E.7060000@start.no> <20070419131442.GC32602149@melbourne.sgi.com> <200704191542.53366.daniele@interline.it>
In-Reply-To: <200704191542.53366.daniele@interline.it>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200704191550.03134.daniele@interline.it>
Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: xfs
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com

On Thursday 19 April 2007 15:42, you wrote:
> On Thursday 19 April 2007 15:14, you wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 10:28:46AM +0200, Stein M. Hugubakken wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > I have a lot of free inodes on my xfs-partitions and was
> > > wondering about what impact this has on performance or memory?
> >
> > None.  The number of free inodes is a made up number. ;)

Sorry. I was really blind. I didn't read "free".

Apologies,
Daniele P.