From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Sun, 06 May 2007 10:21:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp7-g19.free.fr (smtp7-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.64]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l46HL1fB028324 for ; Sun, 6 May 2007 10:21:02 -0700 Date: Sun, 6 May 2007 19:21:04 +0200 From: Emmanuel Florac Subject: Re: XFS crash on linux raid Message-ID: <20070506192104.3becdd81@galadriel.home> In-Reply-To: <20070505210002.GC17112@tuatara.stupidest.org> References: <20070503164521.16efe075@harpe.intellique.com> <20070504073344.GL32602149@melbourne.sgi.com> <20070504152546.614374ac@harpe.intellique.com> <200705041758.21320.Martin@lichtvoll.de> <20070504234357.24d22883@galadriel.home> <463C0CD8.4090402@sandeen.net> <20070505171820.6e92d437@galadriel.home> <20070505210002.GC17112@tuatara.stupidest.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Chris Wedgwood Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Le Sat, 5 May 2007 14:00:02 -0700 vous écriviez: > A 50TB filesystem might suck horrible on a 32-bit platform. I'm not > sure there is *ANY* way you coiuld fsck that should you need in some > cases. > > Is that what you're planning to do? Nope, I'll use an x86_64 system running an x86_64 kernel :) -- -------------------------------------------------- Emmanuel Florac www.intellique.com --------------------------------------------------