From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Tue, 08 May 2007 06:29:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp7-g19.free.fr (smtp7-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.64]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l48DStfB001716 for ; Tue, 8 May 2007 06:28:57 -0700 Date: Tue, 8 May 2007 15:28:53 +0200 From: Emmanuel Florac Subject: Re: Problems with XFS in a power failure Message-ID: <20070508152853.1d387fea@galadriel.home> In-Reply-To: <20070508091613.GA5852@cepheus> References: <20070508091613.GA5852@cepheus> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Uwe =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com Le Tue, 8 May 2007 11:16:14 +0200 vous écriviez: > In theory this should not happen with a journaled fs, does it? That's the opposite. It's the expected behaviour. It's especially important to garantee proper power when using journaling filesystems. -- -------------------------------------------------- Emmanuel Florac www.intellique.com --------------------------------------------------