From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Fri, 25 May 2007 07:49:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org (pentafluge.infradead.org [213.146.154.40]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l4PEnfWt022607 for ; Fri, 25 May 2007 07:49:43 -0700 Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 15:19:56 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: RESVSP problems Message-ID: <20070525141956.GA10669@infradead.org> References: <200705241324.53283.lucke@o2.pl> <20070525050632.GG86004887@sgi.com> <200705251224.23624.lucke@o2.pl> <20070525112441.GQ85884050@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070525112441.GQ85884050@sgi.com> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: David Chinner Cc: ??ukasz Fibinger , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 09:24:41PM +1000, David Chinner wrote: > The original XFS specific code was here: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=117080251026985&w=2 Btw, I think you should just push it for now. We can convert XFS to the generic code once ->fault goes in whenever that may be.