From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Fri, 25 May 2007 06:38:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from poczta.o2.pl (mx10.go2.pl [193.17.41.74]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l4PDbxWt008855 for ; Fri, 25 May 2007 06:38:00 -0700 From: =?utf-8?q?=C5=81ukasz_Fibinger?= Reply-To: lucke@o2.pl Subject: Re: RESVSP problems Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 15:37:54 +0200 References: <200705241324.53283.lucke@o2.pl> <200705251224.23624.lucke@o2.pl> <20070525112441.GQ85884050@sgi.com> In-Reply-To: <20070525112441.GQ85884050@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200705251537.55567.lucke@o2.pl> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: David Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Friday 25 of May 2007, David Chinner wrote: > On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 12:24:23PM +0200, Å?ukasz Fibinger wrote: > > I see. If that's the case, would sharing your 2.6.21 XFS specific fixes > > (you have them, right?) with me be any problem for you? > > The original XFS specific code was here: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=117080251026985&w=2 > > But if you want to patch your own kernel, I suggest that > you use the latest generic version I posted here: > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=117426058311029&w=2 > http://marc.info/?l=linux-fsdevel&m=117426070111133&w=2 > Seems to be working as expected. Thanks. Cheers, Luke