From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Mon, 04 Jun 2007 01:49:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org (pentafluge.infradead.org [213.146.154.40])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l548nhWt031500
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 01:49:44 -0700
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 09:32:22 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: TAKE 965636 - xfs_setfilesize panics on null xfs_inode
Message-ID: <20070604083222.GA16922@infradead.org>
References: <20070604082812.49AF658C38C1@chook.melbourne.sgi.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070604082812.49AF658C38C1@chook.melbourne.sgi.com>
Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: xfs
To: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, sgi.bugs.xfs@engr.sgi.com

On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 06:28:12PM +1000, David Chinner wrote:
> Handle null returned from xfs_vtoi() in xfs_setfilesize().

This doesn't make any sense at all.  xfs_inodes always live longer than
vnodes.  What's the backtrace of the problem you're seeing?