From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
Cc: xfs-dev <xfs-dev@sgi.com>, xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: Review - writing to multiple non-contiguous unwritten extents within a page is broken.
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:50:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070604145054.GA28033@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070523092103.GT85884050@sgi.com>
On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 07:21:03PM +1000, David Chinner wrote:
> Index: 2.6.x-xfs-new/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c
> ===================================================================
> --- 2.6.x-xfs-new.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c 2007-05-23 16:33:04.000000000 +1000
> +++ 2.6.x-xfs-new/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c 2007-05-23 17:52:15.540456674 +1000
> @@ -1008,6 +1008,8 @@ xfs_page_state_convert(
> if (buffer_unwritten(bh) || buffer_delay(bh) ||
> ((buffer_uptodate(bh) || PageUptodate(page)) &&
> !buffer_mapped(bh) && (unmapped || startio))) {
> + int new_ioend = 0;
> +
> /*
> * Make sure we don't use a read-only iomap
> */
> @@ -1026,6 +1028,15 @@ xfs_page_state_convert(
> }
>
> if (!iomap_valid) {
> + /*
> + * if we didn't have a valid mapping then we
> + * need to ensure that we put the new mapping
> + * in a new ioend structure. This needs to be
> + * done to ensure that the ioends correctly
> + * reflect the block mappings at io completion
> + * for unwritten extent conversion.
> + */
> + new_ioend = 1;
> if (type == IOMAP_NEW) {
> size = xfs_probe_cluster(inode,
> page, bh, head, 0);
> @@ -1045,7 +1056,7 @@ xfs_page_state_convert(
> if (startio) {
> xfs_add_to_ioend(inode, bh, offset,
> type, &ioend,
> - !iomap_valid);
> + new_ioend);
Looks good. I'm pretty sure that we had something like a new_ioend variable
in the initial versions of this code, but I don't know when and why we
got rid of it.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-04 14:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-23 9:21 Review - writing to multiple non-contiguous unwritten extents within a page is broken David Chinner
2007-06-04 4:53 ` David Chinner
2007-06-04 14:50 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070604145054.GA28033@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=xfs-dev@sgi.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox