From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Mon, 04 Jun 2007 07:51:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org (pentafluge.infradead.org [213.146.154.40]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l54EosWt023117 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 07:50:58 -0700 Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 15:50:54 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: Review - writing to multiple non-contiguous unwritten extents within a page is broken. Message-ID: <20070604145054.GA28033@infradead.org> References: <20070523092103.GT85884050@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070523092103.GT85884050@sgi.com> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: David Chinner Cc: xfs-dev , xfs-oss On Wed, May 23, 2007 at 07:21:03PM +1000, David Chinner wrote: > Index: 2.6.x-xfs-new/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c > =================================================================== > --- 2.6.x-xfs-new.orig/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c 2007-05-23 16:33:04.000000000 +1000 > +++ 2.6.x-xfs-new/fs/xfs/linux-2.6/xfs_aops.c 2007-05-23 17:52:15.540456674 +1000 > @@ -1008,6 +1008,8 @@ xfs_page_state_convert( > if (buffer_unwritten(bh) || buffer_delay(bh) || > ((buffer_uptodate(bh) || PageUptodate(page)) && > !buffer_mapped(bh) && (unmapped || startio))) { > + int new_ioend = 0; > + > /* > * Make sure we don't use a read-only iomap > */ > @@ -1026,6 +1028,15 @@ xfs_page_state_convert( > } > > if (!iomap_valid) { > + /* > + * if we didn't have a valid mapping then we > + * need to ensure that we put the new mapping > + * in a new ioend structure. This needs to be > + * done to ensure that the ioends correctly > + * reflect the block mappings at io completion > + * for unwritten extent conversion. > + */ > + new_ioend = 1; > if (type == IOMAP_NEW) { > size = xfs_probe_cluster(inode, > page, bh, head, 0); > @@ -1045,7 +1056,7 @@ xfs_page_state_convert( > if (startio) { > xfs_add_to_ioend(inode, bh, offset, > type, &ioend, > - !iomap_valid); > + new_ioend); Looks good. I'm pretty sure that we had something like a new_ioend variable in the initial versions of this code, but I don't know when and why we got rid of it.