* state of the testsuite
@ 2007-06-04 14:44 Christoph Hellwig
2007-06-04 15:02 ` David Chinner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2007-06-04 14:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs
When running the testsuite on Debian -testing I constanyly get the
12 failing testcases (016 041 049 064 071 082 084 104 111 136 140 166).
Is this expected or are other people seeing better results?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: state of the testsuite
2007-06-04 14:44 state of the testsuite Christoph Hellwig
@ 2007-06-04 15:02 ` David Chinner
2007-06-04 15:12 ` David Chinner
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Chinner @ 2007-06-04 15:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christoph Hellwig; +Cc: xfs
On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 04:44:41PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> When running the testsuite on Debian -testing I constanyly get the
> 12 failing testcases (016 041 049 064 071 082 084 104 111 136 140 166).
> Is this expected or are other people seeing better results?
What kernel+platform and what version of the tests?
Prior to 2.6.22-rc2, 016 and 144 are the only ones i saw failing
regularly. 166 will fail until we get ->page_mkwrite
sorted out (but passes in my tree).
With 2.6.22-rc2, all the loopback based tests are failing
because someone broke the loopback device so lots of tests
fail because of that. The other tests I haven't seen fail
for some time...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: state of the testsuite
2007-06-04 15:02 ` David Chinner
@ 2007-06-04 15:12 ` David Chinner
2007-06-04 15:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-06-04 17:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: David Chinner @ 2007-06-04 15:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Chinner; +Cc: Christoph Hellwig, xfs
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 01:02:22AM +1000, David Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 04:44:41PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > When running the testsuite on Debian -testing I constanyly get the
> > 12 failing testcases (016 041 049 064 071 082 084 104 111 136 140 166).
> > Is this expected or are other people seeing better results?
>
> What kernel+platform and what version of the tests?
>
> Prior to 2.6.22-rc2, 016 and 144 are the only ones i saw failing
> regularly. 166 will fail until we get ->page_mkwrite
> sorted out (but passes in my tree).
looks like 082 and 088 have been failing for a while in the
automated QA as well but there's not a lot of other regular
failures....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: state of the testsuite
2007-06-04 15:02 ` David Chinner
2007-06-04 15:12 ` David Chinner
@ 2007-06-04 15:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-06-04 17:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2007-06-04 15:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Chinner; +Cc: Christoph Hellwig, xfs
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 01:02:22AM +1000, David Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 04:44:41PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > When running the testsuite on Debian -testing I constanyly get the
> > 12 failing testcases (016 041 049 064 071 082 084 104 111 136 140 166).
> > Is this expected or are other people seeing better results?
>
> What kernel+platform and what version of the tests?
Current mainline on i386 (running in qemu)
> With 2.6.22-rc2, all the loopback based tests are failing
> because someone broke the loopback device so lots of tests
> fail because of that. The other tests I haven't seen fail
> for some time...
Ok, that should account for the loop stuff. I already suspected
Ken's unlimited number of loop devices patch breaks something.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: state of the testsuite
2007-06-04 15:02 ` David Chinner
2007-06-04 15:12 ` David Chinner
2007-06-04 15:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
@ 2007-06-04 17:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christoph Hellwig @ 2007-06-04 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Chinner; +Cc: Christoph Hellwig, xfs
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 01:02:22AM +1000, David Chinner wrote:
> With 2.6.22-rc2, all the loopback based tests are failing
> because someone broke the loopback device so lots of tests
> fail because of that. The other tests I haven't seen fail
> for some time...
Backing out the dynamic loop device allocations gets me 049 back
to pass.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-06-04 17:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-06-04 14:44 state of the testsuite Christoph Hellwig
2007-06-04 15:02 ` David Chinner
2007-06-04 15:12 ` David Chinner
2007-06-04 15:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-06-04 17:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox