From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Mon, 04 Jun 2007 08:02:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id l54F2XWt028532 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 08:02:34 -0700 Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 01:02:22 +1000 From: David Chinner Subject: Re: state of the testsuite Message-ID: <20070604150222.GL86004887@sgi.com> References: <20070604144441.GA9672@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070604144441.GA9672@lst.de> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 04:44:41PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > When running the testsuite on Debian -testing I constanyly get the > 12 failing testcases (016 041 049 064 071 082 084 104 111 136 140 166). > Is this expected or are other people seeing better results? What kernel+platform and what version of the tests? Prior to 2.6.22-rc2, 016 and 144 are the only ones i saw failing regularly. 166 will fail until we get ->page_mkwrite sorted out (but passes in my tree). With 2.6.22-rc2, all the loopback based tests are failing because someone broke the loopback device so lots of tests fail because of that. The other tests I haven't seen fail for some time... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group