From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Mon, 04 Jun 2007 08:13:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.210]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l54FDqWt000912 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 08:13:54 -0700 Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2007 17:13:51 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: state of the testsuite Message-ID: <20070604151351.GA11536@lst.de> References: <20070604144441.GA9672@lst.de> <20070604150222.GL86004887@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070604150222.GL86004887@sgi.com> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: David Chinner Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 01:02:22AM +1000, David Chinner wrote: > On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 04:44:41PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > When running the testsuite on Debian -testing I constanyly get the > > 12 failing testcases (016 041 049 064 071 082 084 104 111 136 140 166). > > Is this expected or are other people seeing better results? > > What kernel+platform and what version of the tests? Current mainline on i386 (running in qemu) > With 2.6.22-rc2, all the loopback based tests are failing > because someone broke the loopback device so lots of tests > fail because of that. The other tests I haven't seen fail > for some time... Ok, that should account for the loop stuff. I already suspected Ken's unlimited number of loop devices patch breaks something.