From: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: SLUB Allocator?
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 20:31:16 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070625103116.GA31489@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0706211241290.31303@p34.internal.lan>
On Thu, Jun 21, 2007 at 12:42:03PM -0400, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> Is there any XFS filesystem performance benefit using the new SLUB
> allocator?
/me shrugs
When it grows memory defrag of caches, yes. Otherwise I can't
see there being any noticable difference.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-25 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-21 16:42 SLUB Allocator? Justin Piszcz
2007-06-25 10:31 ` David Chinner [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070625103116.GA31489@sgi.com \
--to=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox