From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:48:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spitz.ucw.cz (gprs189-60.eurotel.cz [160.218.189.60]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l5SEmXtL026428 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:48:37 -0700 Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 20:49:24 +0000 From: Pavel Machek Subject: Re: [linux-lvm] 2.6.22-rc4 XFS fails after hibernate/resume Message-ID: <20070627204924.GA4777@ucw.cz> References: <46744065.6060605@dgreaves.com> <4674645F.5000906@gmail.com> <46751D37.5020608@dgreaves.com> <4676390E.6010202@dgreaves.com> <20070618145007.GE85884050@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070618145007.GE85884050@sgi.com> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: David Chinner Cc: David Greaves , David Robinson , LVM general discussion and development , "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" , xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-pm , LinuxRaid Hi! > FWIW, I'm on record stating that "sync" is not sufficient to quiesce an XFS > filesystem for a suspend/resume to work safely and have argued that the only Hmm, so XFS writes to disk even when its threads are frozen? > safe thing to do is freeze the filesystem before suspend and thaw it after > resume. This is why I originally asked you to test that with the other problem Could you add that to the XFS threads if it is really required? They do know that they are being frozen for suspend. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html