From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Wed, 27 Jun 2007 20:07:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id l5S376tL022756 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2007 20:07:09 -0700 Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 13:07:00 +1000 From: David Chinner Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] Fix XFS_IOC_*_TO_HANDLE and XFS_IOC_{OPEN,READLINK}_BY_HANDLE in compat mode Message-ID: <20070628030700.GD989688@sgi.com> References: <20070619132549.266927601@suse.cz> <20070619132726.627137347@suse.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070619132726.627137347@suse.cz> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: mmarek@suse.cz Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 19, 2007 at 03:25:51PM +0200, mmarek@suse.cz wrote: > 32bit struct xfs_fsop_handlereq has different size and offsets (due to > pointers). TODO: case XFS_IOC_{FSSETDM,ATTRLIST,ATTRMULTI}_BY_HANDLE > still not handled. Looks good. Added to my qa tree... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group