Re: Interface for the new fallocate() system call

Jörn Engel
2007-03-30T13:29:30Z

On Fri, 30 March 2007 19:15:58 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> Heiko Carstens writes:
>
> > If possible I'd prefer the six-32-bit-args approach.
>
> It does mean extra unnecessary work for 64-bit platforms, though...

Wouldn't that work be confined to fallocate()? If I understand Heiko
correctly, the alternative would slow s390 down for every syscall,
including more performance-critical ones.

Jörn

--
tglx1 thinks that joern should get a (TM) for "Thinking Is Hard"
-- Thomas Gleixner