Re: After reboot fs with barrier faster deletes then fs with nobarrier

David Chinner
2007-06-27T22:20:53Z

On Wed, Jun 27, 2007 at 06:58:29PM +0100, Szabolcs Illes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using XFS on my laptop, I have realized that nobarrier mount options
> sometimes slows down deleting large number of small files, like the kernel
> source tree. I made four tests, deleting the kernel source right after
> unpack and after reboot, with both barrier and nobarrier options:
>
> mount opts: rw,noatime,nodiratime,logbsize=256k,logbufs=2
>
> illes@sunset:~/tmp> tar xjf ~/Download/linux-2.6.21.5.tar.bz2 && sync &&
> reboot
>
> After reboot:
> illes@sunset:~/tmp> time rm -rf linux-2.6.21.5/
>
> real 0m28.127s
> user 0m0.044s
> sys 0m2.924s
>
> illes@sunset:~/tmp> tar xjf ~/Download/linux-2.6.21.5.tar.bz2 && sync
> illes@sunset:~/tmp> time rm -rf linux-2.6.21.5/
>
> real 0m14.872s
> user 0m0.044s
> sys 0m2.872s

Of course the second run will be faster here - the inodes are already in
cache and so there's no reading from disk needed to find the files
to delete....

That's because run time after reboot is determined by how fast you
can traverse the directory structure (i.e. how many seeks are
involved). Barriers will have little impact on the uncached rm -rf
results, but as the cached rm time will be log-I/O bound, nobarrier
will be far faster (as you've found out).

Cheers,

Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group