From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Tue, 07 Aug 2007 21:08:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id l7848Nbm017415
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Tue, 7 Aug 2007 21:08:27 -0700
Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2007 14:08:04 +1000
From: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: qa 166 failure on f8 kernel
Message-ID: <20070808040804.GJ52011508@sgi.com>
References: <46B91EBA.10407@sandeen.net> <20070808025615.GH52011508@sgi.com> <46B9316A.40508@sandeen.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <46B9316A.40508@sandeen.net>
Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: xfs
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>, xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>

On Tue, Aug 07, 2007 at 09:58:50PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> yeah, figured it had something to do w/ the ia64 weenies when I saw the
> 32 vs. 8, factor of 4 ... fine, fine, my bad.  :)

No, not your bad. Mine if anyones because I wrote the test.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group