From: Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de>
To: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>, Timothy Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>,
ck@vds.kolivas.org
Subject: Re: xfs_fsr and null byte areas in files
Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 22:29:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200708122229.40400.Martin@lichtvoll.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200707262309.24012.Martin@lichtvoll.de>
Am Donnerstag 26 Juli 2007 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
> Am Dienstag 10 Juli 2007 schrieb David Chinner:
> > > 1) Is there an XFS qa test available for xfs_fsr? If so I could use
> > > that one. Are there some hints on how to get started on XFS qa?
> >
> > Yes, test 042. Download it from CVS, build it (installing all the
> > bits it asks for ;), edit common.config to add your test and scratch
> > partitions (both volatile) and the 'check -l 042' to run test 042.
>
> Hi!
>
> I ran test 42 and it completes successfully.
Hello,
I now read a post from someone who faced null byte areas in files after
xfs_fsr as well[1]. And he writes that this problem is related to the ck
patchset:
http://bhhdoa.org.au/pipermail/ck/2007-August/008433.html
It may well be that it is related to the ck patchset in my case as well. I
did not know the exact kernel version anymore when I was using xfs_fsr,
since it took me 2 weeks to actually find about this corruption. Well and
when I ran xfsqa test I had a slighly newer kernel was using the CFS
scheduler instead of the ck patchset. Actually I thought the other was
using the CFS scheduler as well I didn't think of it as having any
relevance so I didn't look into that direction.
But now it seems that the problem actually is related ck patchset and that
I was using a kernel with ck patchset as well. I try to find the time to
run xfsqa test 42 for my latest ck patchset kernel to know for sure.
I just wanted you to know. It seems to me that this may well not been a
problem with XFS at all.
[1] http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2007-07/msg00038.html
Regards,
--
Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de
GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-12 20:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-09 21:13 Fwd: xfs_fsr and null byte areas in files (REPOST) / file data checksumming Martin Steigerwald
2007-07-10 0:50 ` David Chinner
2007-07-10 3:53 ` Timothy Shimmin
2007-07-10 15:48 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-07-26 21:09 ` xfs_fsr and null byte areas in files Martin Steigerwald
2007-08-12 20:29 ` Martin Steigerwald [this message]
2007-08-13 17:25 ` Martin Steigerwald
2007-08-13 17:45 ` [ck] " Felix X
2007-07-26 21:44 ` Martin Steigerwald
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200708122229.40400.Martin@lichtvoll.de \
--to=martin@lichtvoll.de \
--cc=ck@vds.kolivas.org \
--cc=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=tes@sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox