public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Josef Sipek <jsipek@fsl.cs.sunysb.edu>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, nick.couchman@seakr.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [xfs-masters] [Bug 768]  New: Move restrict_chown to mount-time option
Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 15:18:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070908131840.GA18653@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070907191531.GA22883@filer.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu>

On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 03:15:31PM -0400, Josef Sipek wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 09:04:27PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 12:10:06PM -0400, Josef Sipek wrote:
> > > > It's quite easily doable.  I don't have time for that right now, but if
> > > > anyone wants to do it's just adding the option to the mount option
> > > > parser and adding a flag to the mount structure.
> > >  
> > > Wouldn't making this a generic mount-option make sense? Or is it far too
> > > low-level of a concept?
> > 
> > Basically it's a simple boolean flag that's checked in the inode
> > allocator when we decide about the permission of the newly created
> > inode.  Because of that the implementation will be inherently
> > filesystem-specific.
> 
> Couldn't that be done just before the call to ->create as a mask on the
> mode?

Sorry, my post above was talking about the bsd group semantics for which
we had a similar discussion before.  For restricted_chown the method
handling it is ->setattr and given how it's defined to be filesystem
specific I can't see how to do it generically.

> > We could still add a binary mount flag for it in common code, but my
> > stance is to only add these when we actually need to check the flag in
> > general code.
> 
> Or if the feature is so useful that all fs should support it. Is it useful?
> If not, then I agree, not cluttering the VFS is a Good Thing.

It's not really a feature, more a workaround for legacy behaviour in
other Unix variants.  It basically disallows chown in some cases where
it's normally allowed.

      reply	other threads:[~2007-09-08 13:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200709051831.l85IVsTR016106@oss.sgi.com>
     [not found] ` <20070906153529.GA3062@lst.de>
2007-09-06 16:10   ` [xfs-masters] [Bug 768] New: Move restrict_chown to mount-time option Josef Sipek
2007-09-07 19:04     ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-09-07 19:15       ` Josef Sipek
2007-09-08 13:18         ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070908131840.GA18653@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jsipek@fsl.cs.sunysb.edu \
    --cc=nick.couchman@seakr.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox