From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 13 Sep 2007 03:36:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.210])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l8DAaA4p024084
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Thu, 13 Sep 2007 03:36:14 -0700
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 12:36:11 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: state of the cvs tree
Message-ID: <20070913103611.GA3351@lst.de>
References: <20070912121938.GA16870@lst.de> <46E89542.5040202@sgi.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <46E89542.5040202@sgi.com>
Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: xfs
To: Timothy Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, xfs@oss.sgi.com

On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 11:41:22AM +1000, Timothy Shimmin wrote:
> Looking at cvs web it looks like the 2.6.x-xfs was updated 8 hours
> ago. So I am guessing that you saw a state of the tree whilst it
> was doing its sync up.
> Let me know if things are not fine for you still?

Everything is fine now, thanks a lot!