From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:51:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.210]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id l8JFpiv2003681 for ; Wed, 19 Sep 2007 08:51:49 -0700 Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 16:39:04 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix valid but harmless sparse warning in xfs_log_recovery.c Message-ID: <20070918143904.GA8488@lst.de> References: <20070916120433.GA31602@lst.de> <46EF6A6A.3080702@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46EF6A6A.3080702@sgi.com> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Lachlan McIlroy Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 04:04:26PM +1000, Lachlan McIlroy wrote: > Ah thanks for that, my goof. Can you and Tim make sure this goes to Linus? I saw Tim sent out your original fix, and I really don't want to regress on sparse warnings in mainline.