public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Replace XFS bit functions with Linux functions
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2007 12:11:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200710021211.47718.ak@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071002095525.GA25405@infradead.org>


> 
> >  	while (fields) {
> > -		f = (xfs_sb_field_t)xfs_lowbit64((__uint64_t)fields);
> > +		f = (xfs_sb_field_t)find_first_bit((unsigned long *)&fields,64);
> 
> I don't think we should add the case here but rather pass the fields
> varialble as an unsigned long to start with.

I actually did this first, but ran into some issues I unfortunately can't remember right 
now so I reverted it to the cast.

> 
> > @@ -1428,11 +1428,11 @@ xfs_mod_sb(xfs_trans_t *tp, __int64_t fi
> >  
> >  	/* find modified range */
> >  
> > -	f = (xfs_sb_field_t)xfs_lowbit64((__uint64_t)fields);
> > +	f = (xfs_sb_field_t)find_first_bit((unsigned long *)&fields, 64);
> >  	ASSERT((1LL << f) & XFS_SB_MOD_BITS);
> >  	first = xfs_sb_info[f].offset;
> >  
> > -	f = (xfs_sb_field_t)xfs_highbit64((__uint64_t)fields);
> > +	f = (xfs_sb_field_t)fls64((__uint64_t)fields) - 1;
> 
> Same here.

The casts here are actually not needed, but I was too lazy to remove them
(they also don't hurt) 

> 
> > +/* All callers check for 0 arguments already; so no -1 handling */
> > +static inline int xfs_rtlobit(unsigned long v)
> > +{
> > +	return find_first_bit(&v, 32);
> > +}
> > +
> > +#define	XFS_RTLOBIT(w)  xfs_rtlobit(w)
> 
> I think just a
> 
> #define	XFS_RTLOBIT(w)	find_first_bit(&(w), 32)
> 
> should be fine. 

Nope -- not all callers pass sufficiently aligned unsigned longs
as ffb requires.

> Or make it just an inline, but not both a macro an 
> an inline.

That should be probably done as a separate patch because there
are much more macros that need this treatment in the rt code.

-Andi

  reply	other threads:[~2007-10-02 10:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-10-02  8:10 [PATCH] Replace XFS bit functions with Linux functions Andi Kleen
2007-10-02  9:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-10-02 10:11   ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2007-10-02 12:59 ` David Chinner
2007-10-02 13:35   ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-02 16:37 ` Russell Cattelan
2007-10-03 17:58   ` Andi Kleen
2007-10-03 18:20     ` Russell Cattelan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200710021211.47718.ak@suse.de \
    --to=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox