From: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
To: Utako Kusaka <u-kusaka@wm.jp.nec.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] flush inode when changing atime.
Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 19:08:44 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071017090844.GZ995458@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200710170456.AA06101@TNESG9305.wm.jp.nec.com>
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 01:56:00PM +0900, Utako Kusaka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The atime is changed for reading but it returns to a previous value
> after unmount. i_update_core is still off after reading a file using
> read(), readdir() and readlink(). So an inode isn't flushed to disk.
I think this was done by design - Christoph? I can't remember exactly
as it was more than two years ago this change was made. It is effectively
equivalent to using the relatime mount option.
The question is whether we want to change the default behaviour or
whether we need to supply an "atimeisatime" mount option for those
that really need atime to be updated on every access.
> I referred to following fix when I made a patch:
> TAKE 946679 - fix, speedup and simplify atime handling
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-xfs&m=113398234310217&w=4
Yes, that was the patch that removed the explicit atime updates
in the XFS code. Your fix is reverting part of that change.
> --- linux-2.6-xfs.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c 2007-10-15 15:50:10.000000000 +0900
> +++ linux-2.6-xfs/fs/xfs/xfs_vnodeops.c 2007-10-15 16:49:35.000000000 +0900
> @@ -1003,6 +1003,8 @@ xfs_readlink(
> error = xfs_readlink_bmap(ip, link);
> }
>
> + ip->i_update_core = 1;
> +
If we are going to put these back in, then they should be
calls to xfs_ichgtime_fast() so that we know what the reason
for marking the core dirty is.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-17 9:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-17 4:56 [PATCH] flush inode when changing atime Utako Kusaka
2007-10-17 9:08 ` David Chinner [this message]
2007-10-18 3:52 ` Lachlan McIlroy
2007-10-18 4:17 ` David Chinner
2007-10-18 8:01 ` Lachlan McIlroy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071017090844.GZ995458@sgi.com \
--to=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=u-kusaka@wm.jp.nec.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox