* Slow seek in kernels >= 2.6.18
@ 2007-10-18 8:12 Anton A Vorobev
2007-10-18 10:15 ` Bhagi rathi
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Anton A Vorobev @ 2007-10-18 8:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs
Hi!
A question. We've got an application that runs about 30-40 minutes.
After kernel upgrade from 2.6.17 branch, it runs about 3 hours.
I've made tests with the help of bonnie++, it shows that random seek
operations are about 3 times slower in kernels newer than 2.6.18 in
comparison with 2.6.17. This difference may be seen only during high
load of a server. When it is in normal state, parameters are rather the
same.
We use XFS filesystem. Does any one know may it be because of upgrade of
XFS driver in kernel? Any ideas?
Thanks a lot.
______________________________________________________________
Anton Vorobev
Programátor
Seznam.cz, a.s. Radlická 608/2 150 00 Praha 5
tel.: +420 234 694 706
fax: +420 234 694 115
anton.vorobev@firma.seznam.cz
http://www.seznam.cz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Slow seek in kernels >= 2.6.18
2007-10-18 8:12 Slow seek in kernels >= 2.6.18 Anton A Vorobev
@ 2007-10-18 10:15 ` Bhagi rathi
2007-10-18 18:21 ` {WHAT?} " Peter Grandi
2007-10-24 0:37 ` Josef Sipek
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Bhagi rathi @ 2007-10-18 10:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anton A Vorobev; +Cc: xfs
Is it the same on ext file-systems?
Can you run the same tests on disk devices directly to rule out scheduling
issues of i/o requests
by device drivers? One way I was thinking that we got a kind of cache
pollution or invalidation
thus exposing to do more seeks. Can you tell the equivalent file-system
operations that your
application in general do? This will give a lot of insight on what could be
happening.
-Bhagi.
On 10/18/07, Anton A Vorobev <anton.vorobev@firma.seznam.cz> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> A question. We've got an application that runs about 30-40 minutes.
> After kernel upgrade from 2.6.17 branch, it runs about 3 hours.
> I've made tests with the help of bonnie++, it shows that random seek
> operations are about 3 times slower in kernels newer than 2.6.18 in
> comparison with 2.6.17. This difference may be seen only during high
> load of a server. When it is in normal state, parameters are rather the
> same.
>
> We use XFS filesystem. Does any one know may it be because of upgrade of
> XFS driver in kernel? Any ideas?
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Anton Vorobev
> Programátor
> Seznam.cz, a.s. Radlická 608/2 150 00 Praha 5
>
> tel.: +420 234 694 706
> fax: +420 234 694 115
> anton.vorobev@firma.seznam.cz
> http://www.seznam.cz
>
>
>
>
[[HTML alternate version deleted]]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: {WHAT?} Slow seek in kernels >= 2.6.18
2007-10-18 8:12 Slow seek in kernels >= 2.6.18 Anton A Vorobev
2007-10-18 10:15 ` Bhagi rathi
@ 2007-10-18 18:21 ` Peter Grandi
2007-10-24 0:37 ` Josef Sipek
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Grandi @ 2007-10-18 18:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Linux XFS
>>> On Thu, 18 Oct 2007 10:12:28 +0200, Anton A Vorobev
>>> <anton.vorobev@firma.seznam.cz> said:
anton.vorobev> Hi! A question. We've got an application that
anton.vorobev> runs about 30-40 minutes. After kernel upgrade
anton.vorobev> from 2.6.17 branch, it runs about 3 hours. [
anton.vorobev> ... ]
I'd check the elevator and its parameters more than XFS.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: Slow seek in kernels >= 2.6.18
2007-10-18 8:12 Slow seek in kernels >= 2.6.18 Anton A Vorobev
2007-10-18 10:15 ` Bhagi rathi
2007-10-18 18:21 ` {WHAT?} " Peter Grandi
@ 2007-10-24 0:37 ` Josef Sipek
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Josef Sipek @ 2007-10-24 0:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Anton A Vorobev; +Cc: xfs
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 10:12:28AM +0200, Anton A Vorobev wrote:
> Hi!
>
> A question. We've got an application that runs about 30-40 minutes. After
> kernel upgrade from 2.6.17 branch, it runs about 3 hours.
> I've made tests with the help of bonnie++, it shows that random seek
> operations are about 3 times slower in kernels newer than 2.6.18 in
> comparison with 2.6.17. This difference may be seen only during high load
> of a server. When it is in normal state, parameters are rather the same.
I think that's about when the defaults for few /proc/sys/vm/ vars changed.
One from 10 to 5, and another from 40 to 10. I forget the exact filenames.
Josef 'Jeff' Sipek.
--
Once you have their hardware. Never give it back.
(The First Rule of Hardware Acquisition)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2007-10-24 1:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2007-10-18 8:12 Slow seek in kernels >= 2.6.18 Anton A Vorobev
2007-10-18 10:15 ` Bhagi rathi
2007-10-18 18:21 ` {WHAT?} " Peter Grandi
2007-10-24 0:37 ` Josef Sipek
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox