From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Mon, 29 Oct 2007 08:45:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp121.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (smtp121.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [69.147.64.94]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id l9TFisj3010581 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 08:44:56 -0700 Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 08:44:56 -0700 From: Chris Wedgwood Subject: Re: Default mount options (that suck less). Message-ID: <20071029154456.GA25142@puku.stupidest.org> References: <20071029075657.GA84369978@melbourne.sgi.com> <4725FBB4.1010400@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4725FBB4.1010400@sandeen.net> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Niv Sardi , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 10:26:44AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > What would you think of a mkfs conf file like e2fsprogs has, which > defines filesystem classes, and defaults for each? (small, news, > largefile, etc...) That makes more sense for ext2/3 where some meta-data isn't dynamically allocated as needed, for example, historically nntp servers used one file per article and would often run out of inodes.