From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:06:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id l9TL61T6009505 for ; Mon, 29 Oct 2007 14:06:04 -0700 Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 08:05:53 +1100 From: David Chinner Subject: Re: Default mount options (that suck less). Message-ID: <20071029210553.GJ995458@sgi.com> References: <20071029075657.GA84369978@melbourne.sgi.com> <4725E84D.3030609@sandeen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4725E84D.3030609@sandeen.net> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Niv Sardi , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 09:03:57AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Niv Sardi wrote: > > please submit your pet-idea for better defaults here. > > larger logbuf count/size seems to be the other tuning that's thrown > around a lot. Well, we already default to 8 logbufs, and 256k log buffers are not a win in a lot of situations. The log buffer size is a mount option, so it's much easier to tweak once we default to v2 logs... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group