From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com>
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Wed, 31 Oct 2007 08:41:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp115.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (smtp115.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [69.147.64.88])
	by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id l9VFf8G0019157
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Wed, 31 Oct 2007 08:41:11 -0700
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 08:41:11 -0700
From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
Subject: Re: Default mount options (that suck less).
Message-ID: <20071031154111.GA14956@puku.stupidest.org>
References: <20071029075657.GA84369978@melbourne.sgi.com> <4725FBB4.1010400@sandeen.net> <47267EC7.8000906@sgi.com> <177CA06B-41D3-4E4A-9EA6-5688C952CD63@loreland.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <177CA06B-41D3-4E4A-9EA6-5688C952CD63@loreland.org>
Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: xfs
To: James Braid <jamesb@loreland.org>
Cc: Timothy Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>, xfs@oss.sgi.com

On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 11:05:09AM +0000, James Braid wrote:

> We have a ~100TB filesystem that was made with the default mkfs.xfs
> options from memory. The only mount option we use is inode64.

Weta?  Mostly very large files?