From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Sun, 11 Nov 2007 19:11:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id lAC3ApTg021497 for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2007 19:10:55 -0800 Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:10:49 +1100 From: David Chinner Subject: Re: Default mount options (that suck less). Message-ID: <20071112031049.GS66820511@sgi.com> References: <20071029075657.GA84369978@melbourne.sgi.com> <20071031233516.GB88034736@melbourne.sgi.com> <20071112022806.GB102580300@melbourne.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071112022806.GB102580300@melbourne.sgi.com> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Niv Sardi Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 01:28:06PM +1100, Niv Sardi wrote: > No gnus is bad news ? > > Shall I interpret the lack of comments as "everything is fine, just commit the damn thing ?" Lack of comments to what? I haven't seen whatever patches you've sent which means wither you didn't tag the email as "[PATCH N/M]..." or "[REVIEW]..." and I didn't notice the attachments (nope, I see no patches in my archives of this thread) or, more likely, a spam filter along the way ate them. If you get no answer you resend the patches with [PATCH, RESEND] in the title.... Can you please resend all the patches you want reviewed as a patch per email? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group