Re: Default mount options (that suck less).

Eric Sandeen
2007-10-29T15:07:32Z

Hannes Dorbath wrote:
> On 29.10.2007 15:03, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> Niv Sardi wrote:
>>> XFS's default mount options are in most cases sub-optimal, we should try
>>> to have more sensible defaults, so far I'm following some quick dave-powered
>>> recomendations:
>
> Is there any reason to not set the default inode size to 512 bytes? ..as
> suggested in:
>
> http://www.suse.de/~agruen/acl/linux-acls/online/

attr2 should help with the problem now... unless there is some common
case where attr2+256 still spills out a lot?

-Eric