Re: Default mount options (that suck less).

James Braid
2007-11-01T00:47:26Z

On 31 Oct 2007, at 11:27, Justin Piszcz wrote:
> Impressive, what architecture do you run? ia64 or x86_64? What
> performance differences did you see?

It's all just commodity hardware - HP DL385 x86_64 server with a pile
of cheap Infortrend RAID arrays. Performance wise we're limited by a
single HBA to the disks, which is fine for this particular
application because we saturate the network first.

xfs_repair takes a good 36 hours or so and 16-ish GB of memory to
run. (we had to run it recently, thanks to a flakey RAID)