Re: Default mount options (that suck less).

James Braid
2007-10-31T11:21:25Z

On 30 Oct 2007, at 00:45, Timothy Shimmin wrote:
> It might be interesting if people let us know what non-default
> mkfs and mount options that they are using for their various
> configurations/classes.
> Didn't Russell C. have some survey years ago - can't remember if
> that was for h/ware or what now.

We have a ~100TB filesystem that was made with the default mkfs.xfs
options from memory. The only mount option we use is inode64.