From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:53:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from fieldses.org (mail.fieldses.org [66.93.2.214]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id lAEHrHmb027452 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 09:53:18 -0800 Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 12:53:22 -0500 Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc2 XFS nfsd hang Message-ID: <20071114175322.GD14254@fieldses.org> References: <20071114070400.GA25708@puku.stupidest.org> <20071114152952.GA4210@infradead.org> <20071114173922.GC14254@fieldses.org> <20071114174419.GA15271@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20071114174419.GA15271@infradead.org> From: "J. Bruce Fields" Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Chris Wedgwood , linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, LKML On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 05:44:19PM +0000, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 12:39:22PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > This must have come up before; feel free to remind me: is there any way > > to make the interface easier to use? (E.g. would it help if the filldir > > callback could be passed a dentry?) > > The best thing for the filesystem would be to have a readdirplus > (or have it folded into readdir) instead of calling into lookup > from ->filldir. And the readdirplus would pass a dentry to its equivalent of ->filldir? Or something else? --b.