From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:43:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp117.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com (smtp117.sbc.mail.sp1.yahoo.com [69.147.64.90]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id lAGLhLIP018459 for ; Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:43:22 -0800 Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2007 13:43:27 -0800 From: Chris Wedgwood Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc2 XFS nfsd hang Message-ID: <20071116214327.GA9685@puku.stupidest.org> References: <20071114070400.GA25708@puku.stupidest.org> <473AA72C.6020308@panasas.com> <20071114125907.GB4010@fieldses.org> <20071116003410.GA16797@puku.stupidest.org> <59468.62.180.231.196.1195204637.squirrel@housecafe.dyndns.org> <20071116110315.GA27969@puku.stupidest.org> <1195222772.7653.16.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1195222772.7653.16.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Trond Myklebust Cc: Christian Kujau , LKML , "J. Bruce Fields" , Benny Halevy , linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 09:19:32AM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote: > Very funny, but disabling XFS on the client won't help. Oops, I meant it for NFSD... and I'm somewhat serious. I'm not saying it's a good long term solution, but a potentially safer short-term workaround.