From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: XFS related Oops (suspend/resume related)
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 23:07:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200711262307.56742.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071126210844.GB119954183@sgi.com>
On Monday, 26 of November 2007, David Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 02:12:10PM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 10:04:45 +1100, David Chinner wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 11:51:19AM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 09:27:20 +1100, David Chinner wrote:
> > > >
> > > > [...]
> > > >
> > > > > No. I'd say something got screwed up during suspend/resume. Is it
> > > > > reproducable?
> > > >
> > > > No. I often use suspend to RAM, and usually it works without such
> > > > failures. I restart squid during the resume prosecure, and the above
> > > > Oops lead to a squid in D state.
> > >
> > > Ok. Sounds like there's not much we can debug at this point. Thanks
> > > for the report, though.
> >
> > I got a similar Oops again:
> >
> > xfs_iget_core: ambiguous vns: vp/0xc00700c0, invp/0xcb5a1680
>
> Now there's a message that I haven't seen in about 3 years.
>
> It indicates that the linux inode connected to the xfs_inode is not
> the correct one. i.e. that the linux inode cache is out of step with
> the XFS inode cache.
>
> Basically, that is not supposed to happen. I suspect that the way
> threads are frozen is resulting in an inode lookup racing with
> a reclaim. The reclaim thread gets stopped after any use threads,
> and so we could have the situation that a process blocked in lookup
> has the XFS inode reclaimed and reused before it gets unblocked.
>
> The question is why is it happening now when none of that code in
> XFS has changed?
>
> Rafael, when are threads frozen? Only when they schedule or call
> try_to_freeze()?
Kernel threads freeze only when they call try_to_freeze(). User space tasks
freeze while executing the signals handling code.
> Did the freezer mechanism change in 2.6.23 (this is on 2.6.23.1)?
Yes. Kernel threads are not sent fake signals by the freezer any more.
> Is there some way of getting a stack trace of all the
> processes in the system once the machine is frozen and about to
> suspend so we can see if we blocked in a lookup?
Yes. Please add show_state() before the last "return" in freeze_processes().
On 2.6.23.1 you can test the freezer alone by doing
# echo testproc > /sys/power/disk
# echo disk > /sys/power/state
Greetings,
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-26 22:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20071112064706.GA23595@dose.home.local>
[not found] ` <20071112222720.GG995458@sgi.com>
[not found] ` <20071113105119.GA11527@dose.home.local>
[not found] ` <20071113230445.GE995458@sgi.com>
[not found] ` <20071126131210.GA4430@eazy.amigager.de>
2007-11-26 21:08 ` XFS related Oops (suspend/resume related) David Chinner
2007-11-26 22:07 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
[not found] ` <20071127132000.GA31893@dose.home.local>
2007-11-27 15:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-11-27 15:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-11-27 21:11 ` David Chinner
2007-11-27 21:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2007-11-29 21:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200711262307.56742.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox