From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:09:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id lAU59Nqc014183 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 21:09:25 -0800 Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:58:08 +1100 From: David Chinner Subject: Re: XFS performance problems on Linux x86_64 Message-ID: <20071130045808.GK119954183@sgi.com> References: <474C8A05.3020604@e-626.net> <20071127220536.GL119954183@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: Bernd Schubert Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 12:13:57AM +0100, Bernd Schubert wrote: > Hello David, > > David Chinner wrote: > > > > # mkfs.xfs -f -l lazy-count=1,version=2,size=128m -i attr=2 -d agcount=4 > > # mount -o logbsize=256k > > thanks, I was also going to ask which are optimal parameters. Just didn't > have the time yet :) > Any idea when these options will be default? They should already be the defaults in the current CVS tree. ;) Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group