From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list xfs); Thu, 29 Nov 2007 23:54:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from larry.melbourne.sgi.com (larry.melbourne.sgi.com [134.14.52.130]) by oss.sgi.com (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.10/SuSE Linux 0.7) with SMTP id lAU7sTFU032616 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2007 23:54:33 -0800 Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 18:54:31 +1100 From: David Chinner Subject: Re: XFS performance problems on Linux x86_64 Message-ID: <20071130075431.GN119954183@sgi.com> References: <474C8A05.3020604@e-626.net> <20071127220536.GL119954183@sgi.com> <20071130045808.GK119954183@sgi.com> <474FB90C.4060905@tsabi.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <474FB90C.4060905@tsabi.hu> Sender: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: xfs-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: xfs To: =?iso-8859-1?B?VMOzdGg=?= Csaba Cc: David Chinner , Bernd Schubert , linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com On Fri, Nov 30, 2007 at 08:17:32AM +0100, Tóth Csaba wrote: > Hello list, > > I tried this parameters, and got this results with bonnie++. As i think > there isnt any speedup with this parameteres, or i am doing something wrong? The latter. Try creating more than 16 files in your test. Maybe 160,000 instead? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group