public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: Alex Madarasz <List.XFS@madalexlists.nospammail.net>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Fedora 8.0.1 XFS Tune on HW RAID for Max Write Throughput?
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 10:31:27 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071216233127.GY4612@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4764AB08.7040608@sandeen.net>

On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 10:35:20PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> Alex Madarasz wrote:
> > We're building a new Fedora 8.0.1 Linux system to stream data from a
> > 250Msps ADC to disk, and want to start tuning the system configuration
> > for maximum XFS write performance.  To date, without any significant
> > effort at tuning our Fedora 7 dev system, we're seeing 250MBps write
> > with 8-bit samples and ~ 300MBps write with 16-bit samples. We want to
> > push the tuning as far as we can go with this architecture before we
> > start looking at other hardware options.  Looking at various other
> > tuning pages on the Web finds few that are interested in maxing out
> > sequential writes to very large arrays while using SAS HW RAID with big
> > fast SAS drives too.
> 
> ...
> 
> > XFS Tuning Options?
> > 
> > - HW RAID0:
> >   - Array/logical disk HW RAID stripe size?
> 
> At any rate you'll want to match xfs's geometry with the raid geometry.
> 
> >   - Cache enabled (some reports that cache s/b turned off?)?
> 
> If it's battery-backed cache, leave it on, and disable barriers in xfs
> (it's a mount option)
> 
> >   - xfs mkfs / mount options?
> 
> David mentioned these before as a generic place to start:
> 
> # mkfs.xfs -f -l lazy-count=1,version=2,size=128m -i attr=2 -d agcount=4
> <dev>
> # mount -o logbsize=256k <dev> <mtpt>
> 
> and that those would be upcoming new defaults for mkfs.
> 
> 4 ags may not be what you want for a ~2T filesystem.

Right - the 4 AG tuning is effectively for single disk configurations to
limit parallelism and therefore keep seeks between AGs down. When you
have multiple disks, the [new] mkfs defaults should be just fine (i.e.
just drop the agcount suggestion).

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-12-16 23:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-12-14 17:38 Fedora 8.0.1 XFS Tune on HW RAID for Max Write Throughput? Alex Madarasz
2007-12-16  4:35 ` Eric Sandeen
2007-12-16  9:07   ` Justin Piszcz
2007-12-16 23:31   ` David Chinner [this message]
2007-12-16 23:47     ` Justin Piszcz
2007-12-17  0:37       ` David Chinner
2007-12-21  5:07     ` Changliang Chen
2007-12-17  1:17   ` Alex Madarasz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20071216233127.GY4612@sgi.com \
    --to=dgc@sgi.com \
    --cc=List.XFS@madalexlists.nospammail.net \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox